[NJARC] RME and the US Navy during WW2
JOE CRO
n3ibx at verizon.net
Sat Mar 31 05:39:56 EST 2007
Hello John,
I too, have seen military variants of the DB20 preselector,
but never an RME rx with a military ID plate. To my knowledge, the DB-20 was
used to "brighten up" certain receivers used by the military. As an owner of
a RME-69/DB-20 I can tell you that they do make a big difference. The
RME-69/DB20 combo together make a hotter performer than say the RME model 99
introduced in 1940. One would think that the model 99, and later model 45,
would have been used for military consumption. I have a RME publication made
sometime during the later part of WWII that lists the model 45 receiver, but
doesn't show anything in military clothes, so to speak.
I too, would like to find out more about this topic.
Very Best Regards,
Joe Cro N3IBX
----- Original Message -----
From: "john ruccolo" <jr6v6gt at yahoo.com>
To: "New Jersey Antique Radio Club" <njarc at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:31 PM
Subject: [NJARC] RME and the US Navy during WW2
> Visit our web site - See http://www.njarc.org
> _______________________________________________
> Hi Folks,
>
> Recently, I acquired an RME DB-20 preselector with a
> US Navy nomenclature tag. Strangely, this is the
> *second* DB-20 I have found with such a tag. The first
> has some sort of coaxial fittings on the back (not
> SO-239) that appear to be original. This one has the
> "civilian" screw terminals.
>
> Now for my questions -- does anybody know if RME
> receivers were used by the Navy (or any other
> branch)during WW2? I don't think they were....at least
> not in any great qunatity. Then, what did the Navy
> connect the DB-20 to? One of their many NC-100
> variants, or some other receiver?
>
> Any information would be appreciated.
>
> RME receivers are relatively rare, but I have *never*
> seen one with any Navy (or Army) tags.
>
> Interesting sidenote -- inside this preselector is
> written "DD-606." I Googled that I came up with the
> USS Coghlan, a Benson-class destroyer that spent its
> early WW2 days in Alaska, and later served in the
> South Pacific. It was decommissioned in '47 but wasn't
> scrapped until '74! See below:
>
> DD-606 USS COGHLAN
> CLASS - BENSON As Built.
> Displacement 2395 Tons (Full), Dimensions, 348' 4"(oa)
> x 36' 1" x 13' 2" (Max)
> Armament 4 x 5"/38AA, 6 x 0.5" MG, 10 x 21" tt.(2x5).
> Machinery, 50,000 SHP; Westinghouse Geared Turbines, 2
> screws
> Speed, 35 Knots, Range 6500 NM@ 12 Knots, Crew 208.
> Operational and Building Data
> Laid down by Bethlehem Steel, San Francisco.March 28
> 1941.
> Launched February 12 1942 and commissioned July 10
> 1942.
> Decommissioned March 31 1947.
> Stricken July 1 1971.
> Fate Sold June 12 1974 and broken up for scrap.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Don't pick lemons.
> See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
> _______________________________________________
> NJARC mailing list
> NJARC at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc
>
More information about the NJARC
mailing list