[NJARC] Term Limits
John Dilks - K2TQN
[email protected]
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:25:12 -0500
Walt,
The message subject was "Term Limits". I only stated that some members
think that term limits would be a good thing. This was in response to a
statement that one person said (in part): "the present operation of the
club is very good and everyone I know has no complaints."
How you could come up with so many conclusions about my short statement,
boggles my mind.
If you want to so something creative, research to see how many of the early
members (who used to attend every meeting) no longer attend meetings, or
only show up one or two times a year. You might want to ask them why.
73, John Dilks, K2TQN
At 12:47 PM 3/14/04, you wrote:
>John,
>Adopting a passive-aggressive stance isn't helping to enlighten the NJARC
>membership to understand the concerns you have about the club's direction
>and its
>future. Perhaps you can help make things better by explaining some of the
>reasons why some of the members may have complaints.
>
>For example, are members still unhappy about losing access to the Freehold
>and Hightstown locations? Both the Sarnoff and Hazlet locations seem to have
>satisfied our meeting needs. We all know these are interim facilities and
>that,
>ultimately, we will secure our own space at Info Age. And, when we relocate,
>would anyone like to make a bet that there will be dissenters who would
>rather
>stay where we are now simply because they've grown accustomed to these places?
>
>Are members unhappy with the content of the meetings or are folks simply
>unhappy about the choice of available snacks and beverages?
>
>Are folks unhappy about any of the tube, capacitor, or schematic programs
>that the club oversees?
>
>At this point, I don't agree with the process by which the money changes
>hands during the auctions at the club meetings. Currently, it goes
>directly to the
>seller, bypassing the club, which is conducting the auction for the seller.
>This leaves the club at the mercy of the seller who can simply opt not to pay
>the club a portion of the proceeds in return for its service of running the
>auction. Instead, I propose that all money be paid directly to the club
>treasurer
>who will then record the dollars and pay the seller when the auction is
>complete. This simple change in procedure would prevent mishaps as
>occurred during
>the auction this past Friday.
>
>Walt
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
>The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
>or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
>to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
>_______________________________________________
>NJARC mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/njarc