[MVMA] 2018-09-10 and future plans
Chuck Gelm
nc8q-mesh at gelm.net
Tue Sep 11 22:59:49 EDT 2018
On 09/11/2018 09:23 AM, tim-yvonne at juno.com wrote:
> you wrote:MVMA no longer promotes Linksys WRT54Gs, perhaps it is time
> to stop promoting 2397 MHz, 10 MHz bandwidth, SISO devices...
> Perhaps it is coming to this. Rumors among the IT community is that
> Ubiquiti will eventually cease production of all SISO devices; then
> mfgrng MIMO only.
> I see this as a two front effort:
> Front #1... suggest to new areas (not located within our grids
> coverage area) who are starting MESH for the first time... to go
> straight to MIMO. Their high profile nodes can still be omni, but
> they could be rockets with MIMO omnis. Home users can use
> NanoStations... of if they have a decent tower, they too could install
> a Rocket/MIMO omni.
> Front #2 (the more difficult one) is how to migrate an existing
> installed base away from SISO... and over to MIMO What we know from
> experience is that Nanostations (MIMO) do communicate with
> Bullet/Omni's without any issues. So maybe when it comes to future
> recommendations to new Meshies in*our* local area... to no longer
> suggest SISO devices for their QTH.
>
"if they have a decent tower, they too could install a Rocket/MIMO omni"
Hi, Tim:
I agree, as long as the 'neighborhood' class omni is on a different
channel than the 'high profile' omni.
I suggest that no two omnis should hear each other.
I suggest that ham-terminal nodes should not be omni.
Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mvma/attachments/20180911/e8bfc9d9/attachment.html>
More information about the MVMA
mailing list