[MRIC] Why Is This Posted?

[Dan Blasberg]

And three why is it posted since it has not been approved by the  
association?

BTW, January 9th or 16th are good for me.

Dan
KA8YPY


On Dec 1, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Pat Scolla wrote:

> Correct.  So, perhaps I should be asking two questions then:
>
> One, why is not the April 25, 2009 version posted since it is the most
> current?
>
> Two, why is the document even posted when we did not vote to approve  
> it's
> posting?
>
> 73,
> Pat, wb0egr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Blasberg [mailto:ka8ypy at verizon.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 10:55 PM
> To: Pat Scolla
> Cc: mric at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [MRIC] Why Is This Posted?
>
> The current revision has a date of 4/25/2009 and does not include
> specific equipment items in Appendix B.
>
> Dan Blasberg
> KA8YPY
> Prince George's County RO/EC
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Pat Scolla wrote:
>
>> Why is an outdated and non-approved version of the Interoperability
>> Recommendations for Maryland Jurisdictions posted on a public
>> website at
>> http://marylandraces.com ?
>>
>> The information in that document is not valid and it is misleading
>> and I
>> would like to see it removed from that website ASAP.  I do not
>> recall voting
>> to approve the posting of that version of that particular document.
>>
>> Pat Scolla, WB0EGR
>> Harford County RO/EC
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> MRIC mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mric
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:MRIC at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>