Fwd: [MRIC] RACES HF Frequencies
BrettHam at aol.com
BrettHam at aol.com
Fri Nov 9 12:30:38 EST 2007
Bill,
Good comments. I'm going to forward your email to the MRIC reflector for all.
Brett
In a message dated 11/9/2007 11:53:39 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, K3UEZ
writes:
Fellow electron geeks...
At the risk of dating myself and creating a tenuous relationship with those
who propose various frequency bands for RACES nets, let me suggest we avoid
WARC and WARC-subsequent bands whenever possible. The reason is simply a
matter of the lowest common denominator. For example, everyone who has a rig on 60
meters would likely have that same rig useful on 75 meters... but not vice
versa. Lots of HF people simply haven't yet moved into the newer parts of the
spectrum.
My thought would be we should have at least two bands operational... perhaps
75 and 40. Out here we use 10 meters SSB locally. It does a fine job for 15
to 40 miles or so. Enough for our county but not something for statewide,
obviously. We feature frequencies where we find the bulk of equipment already in
use.
73
Bill K3UEZ
Allegany EC/RO
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
More information about the MRIC
mailing list