[MRCG] RTTY net

[Eric M]

How do I unsubscribe from getting e-mails?

Eric M, K6HMG


On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Tim <timsamm at gmail.com> wrote:

> The Clatternet also operated on 40 for awhile (7073 I recall).  I had good
> 40 meter RATT comms to WA/OR and there was a San Diego station that I
> worked as well.  Worth experiments for sure.  During daylight hours 40
> should work fine....
>
> Propagation-wise to Riverside, I am essentially co-located with W6TOM,
> WA6OPE and N6FEG - so 80 meters in the evenings should be similar to the AM
> net on 3985..but RATT should provide a better SNR, all things
> considered....I am running an Inverted L set up for local (0-200 miles)
> NVIS and it works well.  We are 370 miles apart and that is getting into an
> area needing a lower angle for that range.  It's just "db's"  LOL
> I am pretty flexible time wise, with a little heads up.
>
> As to hardware, I think the Clatternet was set up around "common" military
> RATT parameters - and the PRC-47/CV-2455 provided that in stock
> configuration.  Maybe not, It may have been an accommodation, but the
> participating stations usually had at least one PRC-47 going and the more
> flexible transmitters netted to them just fine.
>
> Now to find a 28 Volt MITE terminal for base, mobile and camping Ops.  Dave
> Ross often ran his PRC-47 with a CV-2455 and MITE terminal at MVCC Camp
> Delta - it was quite the show.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Mark J. Blair <nf6x at nf6x.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jul 28, 2014, at 07:02 , Steve <zarco at sonic.net> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the diversion. Congrats
> > > on a successful test session. If you guys ever get on 40 I'll listen
> > > in.
> >
> > No problem! It was another learning experience, as I hadn't looked at the
> > Part 97 text regarding RTTY modes before.
> >
> > Do y'all think that 40 might be a better band for this net? 75 works well
> > for the weekly AM net. I don't have much experience with 80, so I don't
> > know if our experience last night is typical or we just had bad
> conditions,
> > picked the wrong time, etc. It's also possible that Tim and I just don't
> > have a good 80m path between us. I haven't worked Tim on the air much,
> so I
> > don't know what the paths are like between our QTHs. I'll probably get a
> > better feel once more of the usual AM net participants try checking in to
> > the RTTY net.
> >
> > --
> > Mark J. Blair, NF6X <nf6x at nf6x.net>
> > http://www.nf6x.net/
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > MRCG mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrcg
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:MRCG at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > Website: http://www.mrcgwest.org
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCG mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrcg
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCG at mailman.qth.net
>
> Website: http://www.mrcgwest.org
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>