[MRCA] code wheel

[B. Smith]

Interesting, it also gives the spacing information.
Z

On 4/23/2015 1:43 PM, Al Klase wrote:
> Breck,
>
> 3:1 anywhere I've ever seen it.  Is the Bureau of Standards good enough?
>
>
>
>
> Al
> Al Klase – N3FRQ
> Jersey City, NJ
> http://www.skywaves.ar88.net/
>
> On 4/23/2015 11:18 AM, B. Smith wrote:
>> Interesting. Is the 3:1   a published International  Standard or 
>> perhaps just a ham standard that has developed over the years?
>>
>>
>> Z
>>
>> On 4/23/2015 2:56 AM, Mike Morrow wrote:
>>>> What about that dot to dash ratio. Looks like about 5:1?  A ratio
>>>> of 3:1 would be quite a bit of "swing"...
>>> A dash:dot ratio of 3:1 would be NO swing at all.  That is the exact 
>>> definition of the proper lenghth of dash compared to dot for zero 
>>> weighting.
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> MRCA mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mrca
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MRCA at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20150423/d3735956/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 20450 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20150423/d3735956/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 30363 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/mrca/attachments/20150423/d3735956/attachment-0003.png>