[Mobile-Portable] thin antenna cable
W6OAL at aol.com
W6OAL at aol.com
Fri Nov 25 21:05:15 EST 2005
Walter,
As you are experiencing mobile antennas and mobile operation is a
compromise in the first place. It would behoove you to get antennas and cables as
far from the engine compartment as possible. I have an Izusu Trooper (SUV) in
which I run an FT-897 and operate 40M thru 70cm. My thing is to run the
cables (RF) RG-400 and/or RG-142. They are fairly low loss. I don't know about
using that ultra thin stuff, much power and it seems to me that one might have a
fire to contend with. The dielectric of what I use is solid Teflon. The
shield is a tightly woven silver washed copper braid. These go from the rig back
along the drive shaft tunnel and under the back seat to the rear hatch (door
-whatever), up the hinge channel and under the rubber gasket to my antennas
which are mounted on some Comet (many degrees of freedom) mounts. That rubber
gasket fits over a seam of sorts. I have notched it with a rat tail file to
accommodate the coaxes. Leakage is not or at least as of yet has not been a
problem.
And, so there might be a little loss. Your mobile isn't going to be used
for any sort of competition work anyway so what is a little loss here and
there. Look at some of these commercial mobile installations, -6 dB is the norm
and acceptable loss in what they call a good installation. You probably
won't have all that much even if you use RG-58.
CU 73, Dave...
Olde Antenna Lab of Denver
David A. Clingerman, Sc.D. (CEO)
More information about the Mobile-Portable
mailing list