[Milsurplus] BC-652 Ad Nauseam

[Ken]

Yes, Ray, I always found the comment on the RAL to be particularly amusing: being a very "economically challenged" young ham, I used an NIB RAL-7 as my main station receiver for around 12 years for every mode, and found it to be a superb receiver. I still consider it to be the finest HF TRF receiver ever built.My ONLY complaint with it was the non-existent frequency read-out.I also had an RAK. I used it to copy the VLF Navy stations for code practice. One thing I was surprised about was that the RAK provided "single signal" selectivity: the "other side" of "zero-beat" simply wasn't there. I still don't know how RCA accomplished that.Ken W7EKBSent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Ray Fantini via Milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> Date: 6/6/24  07:13  (GMT-08:00) To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Milsurplus] BC-652 Ad Nauseam 
Many may regard the
 authors comments as derogatory but I find them entertaining.
Especiallly like the comment on page 71 of the manual with regard to the RAL.
Ray F/KA3EKH
 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20240606/c4610803/attachment.html>