Yes, Ray, I always found the comment on the RAL to be particularly amusing: being a very "economically challenged" young ham, I used an NIB RAL-7 as my main station receiver for around 12 years for every mode, and found it to be a superb receiver. I still consider it to be the finest HF TRF receiver ever built.

My ONLY complaint with it was the non-existent frequency read-out.

I also had an RAK. I used it to copy the VLF Navy stations for code practice. One thing I was surprised about was that the RAK provided "single signal" selectivity: the "other side" of "zero-beat" simply wasn't there. I still don't know how RCA accomplished that.

Ken W7EKB



Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S21 5G, an AT&T 5G smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: Ray Fantini via Milsurplus <[email protected]>
Date: 6/6/24 07:13 (GMT-08:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Milsurplus] BC-652 Ad Nauseam

Many may regard the authors comments as derogatory but I find them entertaining.

Especiallly like the comment on page 71 of the manual with regard to the RAL.

Ray F/KA3EKH