[Milsurplus] [MMRCG] "Radio Prepares for War"
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Tue Apr 28 12:01:11 EDT 2020
On 28 Apr 2020 at 11:36, Al Klase wrote:
> Army contracts early on. I believe the Signal Corps had
> input on the later Super-Pro designs.
That is interesting....
> RCA did a lot of special purpose comm receivers like
> BC-224/348, RAK/RAL, RBA/RBB/RBC, BC-312/342
> etc. Not to mention the AR-88. Like I said elsewhere, they
> were the 700-pound gorilla.
Yes. They also had some screwups, like the later SRR-11,12,13 series. Although I like
those receivers a lot, they do need some mods to make them more reliable, mainly due to
the heat problem.
> The Britts snapped up HRO's because they could.
Well, I suspect there is much more to that story than that simple reason.
> I don't
> think the SX-28 was as good as the HRO or Super-Pro,
> but the FCC put them to good use. They were perfectly
> adequate.
Well, the only SX-28 I ever used, when I was back in high-school, impressed me very much.
In fact, it is the only Hallicrafters receiver (other than that SP-600 clone R-274-thing) that
did impress me. I could never understand how Hallicrafters receivers could, in general, be
so unstable, when their transmitters weren't.
The SX-28 IS rather complex and laid out poorly, but it works very well when properly
restored. It is also kind of "military truckish", like the BC-779 et al.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list