[Milsurplus] Fw: Who is GHS?
Bruce Gentry
ka2ivy at verizon.net
Wed Oct 3 20:35:56 EDT 2018
There were many pieces of gear from that era that ran blazing hot. In
the case of the SRR_____ series, omitting the screen resistors may have
been for economy and/or "reliability", eliminating the screen resistors
and bypass condensers left fewer parts to fail. Tubes were expected to
wear out, so replacing them when weak was probably not counted in
reliabily figures unless they failed catastropically. ARC-27s, and
GRA-53s/TRC-68s were two I knew well that cooked themselves to death,
and a lot of the radio relay gear of the same era did too. Many of the
sub miniature tubes were run as hard as 7 or 9 pin miniatures, without
the large envelope and structure to dissipate the heat, and a lot more
of them were crammed into a very small space. I also think many
manufacturers knew transistors were on the way, tried to miniaturize
tubes so their gear would not look so obsolete, and stave off the costs
and effort to change to solid state as long as they could. Does anyone
know of any military rigs that used Nuvistors or Compactrons? Those
were other efforts to hold off the inevitable.
Bruce Gentry, KA2IVY
On 10/3/18 2:49 PM, Kenneth G. Gordon wrote:
> On 3 Oct 2018 at 14:19, Jim Whartenby wrote:
>
>> As with the ARC-21, subminiature tube reliability was dismal.
>
>
> In that rig, many of the tubes are run very hot and this contributed to short life in that series
> of receivers.
>
> Yet if those tubes are used at or below their maximum ratings, they are very reliable.
>
>
>
> At first, we had a lot of failures, but after I modified them so that the screen voltages to the
> pentode/tetrodes was reduced to "somewhat below" the plate voltage (!), temperature
> dropped markedly, operation appeared normal, and the receivers then became much more
> reliable.
>
> As I remember it, the screens were essentially connected directly to the plate supply. I
> added suitably bypassed 51K resistors to the screen feed at all those tubes which required
> it and that made a big difference.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list