[Milsurplus] Fw: Who is GHS?
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Wed Oct 3 14:49:44 EDT 2018
On 3 Oct 2018 at 14:19, Jim Whartenby wrote:
> As with the ARC-21, subminiature tube reliability was dismal.
Hmmm...this is interesting to me for the simple reason that the submini tubes were originally
designed and built to be used in proximity fuses.
One Sylvania bulletin I have here shows that at least some of those tubes were rated at
something like 10,000Gs for survival.
I know that the SRR-11/12/13 uses those.
In that rig, many of the tubes are run very hot and this contributed to short life in that series
of receivers.
Yet if those tubes are used at or below their maximum ratings, they are very reliable.
For instance, as I have mentioned here at least once before, back in the 1970s, I was
working with a rather odd professor who was using them to monitor VLF and MF/HF stations
24/7/365.
At first, we had a lot of failures, but after I modified them so that the screen voltages to the
pentode/tetrodes was reduced to "somewhat below" the plate voltage (!), temperature
dropped markedly, operation appeared normal, and the receivers then became much more
reliable.
As I remember it, the screens were essentially connected directly to the plate supply. I
added suitably bypassed 51K resistors to the screen feed at all those tubes which required
it and that made a big difference.
Ken W7EKB
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list