[Milsurplus] 800 CPS inverters

[James Whartenby]

Nice source Elden, thanks!  To be fair, the choice of 400 cycles was also arbitrary according to the information on page 421.The savings in weight from 60 to 400 cycles is 50% when the RadLab volume 17 was written.  Don't know if this is still true; seems low.Jim

      From: elden meyer via Milsurplus <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
 To: "milsurplus at mailman.qth.net" <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net> 
 Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 7:24 AM
 Subject: [Milsurplus] 800 CPS inverters
   
 There is a brief but interesting section on invertersin volume 17 of the MIT Radiation Lab Series.
As mentioned here recently the author states thatthe Navy choice of 800 CPS was more or less arbitraryand made prior to the standardization on 400 CPS.
The series is on-line at:
https://www.jlab.org/ir/MITSeries.html
Elden______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

   

|  | Virus-free. www.avast.com  |

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20171118/8f5233d7/attachment.html>