[Milsurplus] TCM-2

[WA5CAB at cs.com]

You have to remember that the Navy, having in the first place far fewer of 
everything than the Army, didn't jump on the "get rid of everything - 
there'll never be another war" bandwagon like the Army did.  In the second place, 
although the Navy mothballed hundreds of ships, they didn't actually scrap 
that many.  And all of the radios aboard ships were mothballed with the ships 
rather than being pulled off and surplused out.

Robert Downs - Houston
wa5cab dot com (Web Store)
MVPA 9480

In a message dated 07/05/2017 00:05:20 AM Central Daylight Time, 
kgordon2006 at frontier.com writes: 
> I don't understand why more hams didn't jump on the TCM. It would have 
> been a perfect ham 
> rig for CW. It is small, it is VFO controlled, it covers all the main ham 
> bands, its power 
> requirements are reasonable, it is very stable, keying sounds very good. 
> Maybe there weren't 
> very many of them made. I dunno. It is a really neat rig.
> 
> Ken W7EKB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20170705/ec53e5f8/attachment-0001.html>