[Milsurplus] Vibrator Replacement Challenge
Kenneth G. Gordon
kgordon2006 at frontier.com
Thu Apr 6 16:12:17 EDT 2017
On 6 Apr 2017 at 16:05, B. Smith wrote:
> I propose that those that have experimented with various
> vibrator circuits actually construct and "test" their circuit in an
> actual piece of military equipment . The AN/GRR-5 filament vibrator
> would be an ideal subject. Then after testing publish this information
> either on the web or in a publication such as "Electric Radio".
Sounds like an excellent plan to me.
> This vibrator replacement would either be housed in the original
> can or be small enough to mount in the space that the original vibrator
> housing occupied and must be operating at the correct frequency. The
> circuit would utilize the original vibrator socket and contain its own
> heat sink. And hopefully this replacement would be as quiet across the
> spectrum as the original vibrator. :-)
>
> Its one thing to theorize and play with vibrator replacement
> circuits on the bench but in the end actual testing in a power supply
> mounted in a piece of equipment is necessary. But most important -
> document and please share the information with others.
>
> I realize that there are several vendors that advertise
> replacement vibrators for automobile radios etc., but this challenge is
> for older vintage military equipment.
Actually, some milradio outfit in the UK already markets exact plug-in replacement
solid-state "vibrators" for the DY-88, WS-19, etc, and other such.
I'll try to find the link unless someone else here has that.
Ken W7EKB
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list