[Milsurplus] Quick n dirty crystal selectivity - it no workee
Hubert Miller
kargo_cult at msn.com
Mon Feb 15 23:56:24 EST 2016
No, you’re in the right lunch line. I wondered about that too; it’s supposed to decrease the coupling of the presently overcoupled primary to secondary.
Right now I’m still downsizing to prepare for another move, but i hope to:
get a selectivity graph before, stock
try the one shorted turn idea, graph
remove turns from the seconday, graph
-Hue
From: Milsurplus [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of hwhall at compuserve.com
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 8:48 PM
To: kargo_cult at msn.com; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Quick n dirty crystal selectivity - it no workee
Yes, there is that. Oh, well. My memory is trying to recall another stunt I though I'd seen for fiddling with coupling... seems like it involved a 1-turn ring between coils. Or maybe I'm out to lunch on that!
Wayne
WB4OGM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20160215/d9df068d/attachment.html>
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list