[Milsurplus] Question ( RBS; submarine )

[Ray Fantini]

The base of my argument is your web site.  I am not an expert on history or procurement but simply look at the listings, publications and items on line and seeing what’s listed on your web site (http://www.virhistory.com/navy/rcvrs/d-df.htm ).  What I consider to be the premier web page for US Navy communications and looking at the DAK, DAQ and the shore base DAB don’t see anything up to that challenge.
If it existed I would think it would be evident in some publication and on your web site.

Ray F/KA3EKH

From: Nick England [mailto:navy.radio at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 6:21 PM
To: Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>
Cc: Military Surplus List <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Question ( RBS; submarine )

The evidence in contemporary reports, equipment mods, etc. shows that either:
1) NRL, the US Navy, the Royal Navy, and the Kriegsmarine all believed it was a real possibility.
or 2) those same people were consciously running a con game.

I like #1 and you like #2. We'd all love to see some evidence that LO DFing actually happened or that it was just a Vast Right-wing Conspiracy.
 I suspect a very real worry that it could happen led to the "myth" that it actually did happen.

For full details, see drawer 3, filing cabinet 432, location FD-34 in the Indiana Jones Memorial Warehouse.

Cheers
Nick

On Thursday, August 25, 2016, Ray Fantini <RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu<mailto:RAFANTINI at salisbury.edu>> wrote:
I am still not buying it,


--
Nick England K4NYW
www.navy-radio.com<http://www.navy-radio.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20160826/b43b2741/attachment-0001.html>