[Milsurplus] Question ( RBS; submarine )

Francesco Ledda frledda at att.net
Thu Aug 25 22:42:21 EDT 2016


To limit LO leakage, the URR-13 has a differential mixer fed by a differential LO. Pretty smart!

Frank
K5URG

> On Aug 25, 2016, at 19:33, mstangelo at comcast.net wrote:
> 
> 
> Were they concerned about LO radiation being picked up by other receivers on board ship? This is another reason to minimize LO radiation.
> 
> Mike N2MS
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nick England <navy.radio at gmail.com>
> To: Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
> Cc: Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Sent: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 01:54:59 -0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Question ( RBS; submarine )
> 
> My point was that NRL was evidently designing Navy receivers in the
> early/mid-1930s to minimize LO radiation. It wasn't wartime panic; to
> them it was a prudent concern for future DF capability.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list