[Milsurplus] [RCA] SRR-13 Article
George Babits
gbabits at custertel.net
Fri Aug 5 14:33:34 EDT 2016
I must have been thinking of something else when I said the SRR was heavier.
I had a couple of behemouth LF sets made by National that were full of
nuvistors. They each weighed over 100 pounds. Later, I got another
heavyweight LF receiver in the 100 pound rangs. I was thinking that was an
SRR, but may have been something else. I haven't weighed the R-808 yet.
Werent they designed for RTTY only?
73,
George
W7HDL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006 at frontier.com>
To: <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] [RCA] SRR-13 Article
> On 5 Aug 2016 at 10:07, Hubert Miller wrote:
>
>> Well, there might be a flood of R-808s later this year then. I'm
>> thinking of disposing of mine also. I think this thread has solidified
>> my thinking on that desicion. I thought the R-808 was the heavier. I
>> had only one SRR, which i never tried out, and only repacked and
>> shipped to an acquaintance. But it didn't seem all that heavy. I'll
>> have to check my manual. -Hue
>
> The SRR-11/12/13 weigh 69 lbs each.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list