[Milsurplus] [RCA] SRR-13 Article

Richard Solomon dickw1ksz at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 14:16:30 EDT 2016


IMHO, the R-808 is a perfect
example of waste in Government.

Why was it created when the
R-392 already existed ? Further
proof of lunacy comes when one
looks at how many were made and
how many contracts were let to
build them.

73, Dick, w1KSZ

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Kenneth G. Gordon <kgordon2006 at frontier.com
> wrote:

> On 5 Aug 2016 at 10:07, Hubert Miller wrote:
>
> > Well, there might be a flood of R-808s later this year then. I'm
> > thinking of disposing of mine also. I think this thread has solidified
> > my thinking on that desicion.  I thought the R-808 was the heavier. I
> > had only one SRR, which i never tried out, and only repacked and
> > shipped to an acquaintance. But it didn't seem all that heavy. I'll
> > have to check my manual. -Hue
>
> The SRR-11/12/13 weigh 69 lbs each.
>
> Ken W7EKB
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/milsurplus/attachments/20160805/75b84046/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list