[Milsurplus] BC-229, RU selectivity
Brian Carling
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Fri Aug 1 16:04:58 EDT 2014
BC-230 is no GRC-109.
That's a far better transmitter IMHO...
Best regards - Bry Carling
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Hue Miller <kargo_cult at msn.com> wrote:
>
> Dave's work with the BC-230/430 caused me to think about the RUGF set also, and about how to make using the rec more
> feasible on the air. How about using a converter from the 80M band down to say, the 300-400 kcs range, and then using an
> LF coil in the rec? In the BC-229/429, that's 4 tuned circuits, about the equivalent of a single IF bottom-end receiver
> selectivity, but "maybe" usable. On the RU, you'd only have 3 tuned circuits of selectivity, as the 4th tuned circuit is
> for the CW osc. I don't think regenerative feedback in the RF stages is a very practical idea, as you'd have to have an
> external control and also likely an RF gain control too.
> I won't be trying these ideas myself, i don't think: equipment that requires control boxes and a slew of connectors
> and cables makes me feel the opposite of relaxed.
> -Hue ( Newport, Oregon )
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list