[Milsurplus] Fwd: Re: Over-Protective?

Bruce Gentry ka2ivy at verizon.net
Tue Jan 15 12:01:34 EST 2013



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Milsurplus] Over-Protective?
Date: 	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:07:55 -0500
From: 	Bruce Gentry <ka2ivy at verizon.net>
To: 	David Stinson <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>



On 1/14/13 8:50 AM, David Stinson wrote:
>  Why on earth were two sub-mini tubes so heavily protected?
>
>  http://www.ebay.com/itm/281044678018
>  ______________________________________________________________
>  Milsurplus mailing list
>  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>  Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
The seller probably took a box originally  for  something truly delicate
and used it for marketing hype.  The way the tubes were wrapped in their
original  individual cardboard boxes makes sense, it allowed them to be
delivered by parachute or other fast and rough  delivery.

      Bruce Gentry   KA2IVY



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list