[Milsurplus] BC-348-Q being cheap

[Mike Morrow]

Mike wrote:

> I've always preferred the non-Q models...to me, the antenna trimmer 
> alone is a feature worth having...

I like the HKLR versions...the 41 in the AF output of the earlier
models is psychologically off-putting.  At the same time that makes
an EMOP seem more appropriate for the BC-375-* with its 211 and 25A
tubes. :-)

> Opinions are fine - everyone has one...

I like to say...oh...something similar to:  

"Opinions are like noses...everyone has one and they all smell."

> ...but it would be interesting to see a refreshed model of each
> series put through a comprehensive set of receiver tests, with 
> data like signal distortion, noise floor, dynamic range, etc.
> being collected.

That would be a fascinating project.  It would require tremendous
effort to be credible.

73,
Mike / KK5F