[Milsurplus] BC-348-Q being cheap

[Mike Morrow]

> How do others on this group feel about the often heard view that the
> "Q" model is a better performer?

That's a very surprising premise.  For the almost 50 years I've been
reading about the BC-348-*, conjecture runs more often to the effect
that JNQ models perform as well as the earlier versions, as if to provide
assurance that despite the many and often significant electrical  and
mechanical simplifications, the JNQ still performs adequately.

I have the P, Q, and R models.  I like the R best, but I would make no
performance claims for one over another.  

73,
Mike / KK5F