[Milsurplus] WW2 Interception Receivers

[C.Whitaker]

de WB2CPN
Very true, the BC-779 Super Pro series was nice,
but setting to a specific frequency< (in the absence
of a signal), required a transmitter or a freq meter.
There was one other way, if a dependable signal
was on the air.  Calibration was all relative.
The Sig Corps had various types of National then.
73  Clete


On 5/14/2012 10:59 AM, Jim Haynes wrote:
> I read somewhere that the English intercept operation preferred the U.S.
> Hammarlund HRO over all others.  But the item didn't say what was so
> superior about the HRO.  I might speculate that being a single-dial
> receiver rather than a two-dial receiver it was more accurately resettable
> once a target frequency was found.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>