[Milsurplus] Milsurplus Digest, Vol 82, #29

[Hue Miller]

>I suspect there is more than one "uninitiated " reader of this forum 
based on questions I have read;however, the information link to several 
common radio types , as described, was posted for public consumption and 
some information is better than none. A more positive response may have 
been for the responder to provide his wisdom for the benefit of the link 
readers, if corrections can be made to improve the integrity of the 
information. I fail to see any purposeful disinformation.
Ralph
VE3BBM

-Link readers here, for the greatest part, certainly are not in need of 
any wisdom from me, and no one, I'm sure, will enjoy me posting an
introductory text here. A google search, for the beginner, will turn
up numerous photos + information more rewarding than the minimal
effort put into those pages. No reflection at all on you, sir. I stated 
that now we are aware this source exists, yes, and thank you for pointing
it out, and as they say, probably all publicity is good. I personally do
not see any point in awarding more points for lackadaisical 
misinformation than for purposeful disinformation. Based only on
my experience, I'd preemptively bet that the website owners would
not give a poop for my suggestions on improving their accuracy.
Ralph, I am not attacking you. But - I think I have a right to 
criticize that website. -Hue