[Milsurplus] (Mil mods, pro and con
J. Forster
jfor at quik.com
Sat Feb 5 21:21:24 EST 2011
> A reaction to John F's comment:
>
> Do tell.
> But aren't you already a charter member ?
I hope so.
> Many of the members of our present day internet radio
> reflectors got their start in radio by hamifying these míl rigs
> and otherwise would not even be here, reading this.
> I assume that you and your co-champions of pristine purity
> would also insist that military field changes to modify in order
> to improve, customize for new applications and to
> remedy gear deficiency are exempt and not to be
> considered mods. So if you change a rig while you're in
> uniform it's sanctioned -- but do it when you're
> back in your civvies is a no-no .
> But then again, the world would a dreary place indeed,
> if we all had the same point of view.
>
>> HM
In the documentation for some radios, there are authorized mod
instructions. If those are/were done, using the specified parts, I've no
gripes.
BUT, I do not like "mods" that say... "strip everything from the chassis
but the tube sockets....."
Most all mods I've seen reduce the performance of the sets.
YMMV,
-John
================
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list