[Milsurplus] ARB
MillerKE6F at aol.com
MillerKE6F at aol.com
Sun Aug 28 18:28:21 EDT 2011
Once again, the point of my commentary is lost on the folks who see
adapting or converting or making something easier to use or more useful to one's
needs as a "perversion."
>From my view of the ARB, having owned a few over the past 50+years of
hamming, were and remain a hodgepodge design with little to recommend them
either to the military or to the ham. That the ham who transplanted to parts
into a usable package says much about the tenacity of the person who took
on the task. And in the decade following the war the essence of ham radio
on a budget was to make the best of a decades old design that had and still
has little appeal to the end user unless that person is restoring an old
war bird and wanted original equipment.
The ARB is not a very usable package from a ham standpoint. The tiny
and almost unreadable dial and lack of band spread alone was a distinct
disadvantage form a ham radio viewpoint. The radio's stability was less than
enchanting as was its selectivity. The motor drive was cute, but non
essential from a ham radio standpoint. And like most radio junk that came out of
WWII, the form factor was another problem for a lot of folks who preferred
more desk top functionality.
As I've said a few times before, the real history of much of this junk
is how hams and experimenters made use of war materiel and if not for the
hams and experiments rat packing this stuff into attics and garages, there
would be little if any of this stuff around to argue about.
Bob, KE6F
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list