[Milsurplus] Aircraft comm/nav specs
Ray Chase
raydio862 at verizon.net
Tue Aug 24 16:55:58 EDT 2010
Could it be mandating 25kc channel spacing vs. prior 50 kc. channel spacing?
This was an issue for some years to the general aviation community.
Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Kinderman" <scr274 at gmail.com>
To: <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:14 PM
Subject: [Milsurplus] Aircraft comm/nav specs
> What happened on Jan 1, 1997 to affect aircraft comm specs? Anything to do
> with acceptability of plain old AM as in ARC-3, ARC-1 operation? Something
> tells me it was related to minimum channel capacity?
>
> Anyone?
>
>> _____
>>
>>
>> Something that has surprised me is the number of aircraft radios that
>> were
>> made unacceptable on 1 Jan 1997 that still draw way too much money. I
>> talked to one of the local radio shops...
>>
>>
> Ken,
>
> W2EWL
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list