[Milsurplus] Ten-Tec Receiver MIL Version

[Glenn Little WB4UIV]

I had one of the SP-325 receivers once.
The circuit boards looked like they were made in a garage using a 
magic marker to draw on the traces before etching.
I would no produce anything of this poor quality for my own use.
The receiver did perform fairly.
I off loaded the receiver at the first hamfest after I won it on 
military auction for $100.00.

Never missed this receiver.

73
Glenn
WB4UIV


At 05:51 PM 12/28/2009, John Flood wrote:
>Also...
>
>There was a Model SP-325 I  think.  Some sort of special Navy 
>contract to be used as a training RX never seen one but have seen 
>mixed reviews online.  I'd like to try one out at some point to see 
>if Ilike it.
>
>John Flood
>KB1FQG
>
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
> > From: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz at q.com>
> > To: milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> > Sent: Mon, December 28, 2009 5:36:20 PM
> > Subject: [Milsurplus] Ten-Tec Receiver MIL Version
> >
> >
> > Didn't Ten-Tec make a receiver that they sold (or tried to sell) to the
> > Military ? I seem to remember seeing one over on the "evil empire", but
> > I don't recall the model.
> > Anyone have an idea what I am talking about or have I slipped another
> > gear !!
> >
> > 73, Dick, W1KSZ
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Milsurplus mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>______________________________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html