[Milsurplus] big crystals
Bob Camp
ham at cq.nu
Mon Oct 8 10:19:28 EDT 2007
Hi
As you go lower in frequency a crystal has to get thicker. There is
also a minimum width or diameter that will do well for a given
thickness. The diameter / thickness stuff is mostly noticeable below
3 MHz with WWII era crystal holders and resonator designs.
One simple way to look at it: If a 3 MHz crystal needs to be 1/2 inch
across, a 300 KHz crystal would need to be 5" across.
Obviously nobody is going to make a lot of 5" crystals, either for
fixed or portable (!) use. As you go lower in frequency you go to a
cut that does not require as large a diameter / thickness ratio.
Another trick is to swap things around so you only need one large
dimension and the rest can be small. You also can trade performance
for size if you have to. All of that helps some, but you still need a
larger width at the lower frequencies. .
If you are building a transmitter that is going to work below the AM
band, you are going to need big crystals. If you are using pressure
holder technology, they are going to be rectangular blanks. That
gives you great big holders. A lot of designs start at the low
frequency end of the range and then work up. The same crystal holder
is retained over the entire range. It's far easier to stock one set
of parts in the factory than to fiddle with several variations.
Of course if you get low enough, you just use a bare quartz bar in a
pine box. Take a look at an old GR 100 Kc standard if you ever get a
chance ...
Bob
KB8TQ
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list