[Milsurplus] Yamamoto Mission: P-38 Radio Navigation

Dave davprin1 at optusnet.com.au
Sun Dec 2 18:20:28 EST 2007


This article indicates a Navy ship's compass was fitted to the P-38 for the
mission. No mention of a radio compass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Isoroku_Yamamoto

Cheers
Dave

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Morrow" <kk5f at earthlink.net>
To: "milsurplus" <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 2:47 AM
Subject: [Milsurplus] Yamamoto Mission: P-38 Radio Navigation


> Hue wrote:
>
> >So for example, the P-38s that intercepted  Adm. Yamamoto's
> >plane, were they flying solely by compass and map visuals?
>
> I wrote:
>
> >I don't know what that mission used for long-range navigation,
> >but it would seem a good candidate for USAAF use of the ZB system
> >with the SCR-274-N BC-946-B BCB receiver and the R-1/ARR-1 homing
> >adapter.
>
> Francesco wrote:
>
> >I am sure that it was compass, watch and a little luck....
>
> Don't be so sure.  Read the pilot testimony.
>
> Col. Rex Barber, the pilot who history backs as the one who downed
Yamamoto's aircraft, states some details of the event at:
>
> http://www.southernoregonwarbirds.us/fa0.html
>
> One quote says:
>
> "Not only did it depend on absolute, precise adherence to schedule on the
part of Yamamoto but on absolute, precise navigation on our part to arrive
at exactly that same place and time. A half-dozen miles or minutes one way
or the other, on either the Admiral's or on our parts, could easily negate
the entire opportunity. Small differences in the reported winds enroute
could be enough to drift us too far off course. To help [squadron commander
Major John W.] Mitchell in his overwater navigation the Navy had installed a
special compass in his plane."
>
> "Mitchell then proceeded out on course with all the rest of us just
following. We did little or no navigation, we just followed wherever
Mitchell led us, in absolute radio silence."
>
> Note those words "the Navy had installed a special compass in his plane."
The only WWII-era Navy "special compass" that could have provided the
precision track information, unaffected by crosswinds, needed for this 430
mile open water mission is the ZB homing system, and the term "compass" is
completely appropriate for the ZB.  Does anyone have a more likely candidate
for this "special compass"?
>
> The date of the mission, 18 April 1943, likely pre-dates the introduction
of the USAAF's BC-946-B and AN/ARR-1 version of the ZB, but the ZB had been
in service for two years on USN aircraft by then.  Testimony and evidence
seem to lead one to very reasonably conclude that a USN ZB installation was
on board Mitchell's P-38 and that it was an essential key to mission
success.  If the simple and easily-installed ZB system was not part of this
mission, someone should have lost his command!
>
> This mission was a "Navy Show" and the attack team pilots, though USAAF,
received Navy Crosses instead of the Army equivalent Distinguished Service
Cross.
>
> Mike / KK5F
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.12/1163 - Release Date:
1/12/2007 12:05 PM
>
>



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list