[Milsurplus] ARB Receiver Canvas Cover
Glenn Little WB4UIV
glennmaillist at bellsouth.net
Sun Sep 24 18:55:48 EDT 2006
Having served in the submarine service, we had a lot of classified
equipment. If the equipment was in a place that it could be viewed by
someone without a clearance, there was a cover for it. At sea, the covers
were not installed. On an aircraft, it could be that the security cover was
installed on the classified equipment. On a carrier, I could see the covers
being installed to prevent the uncleared steward from seeing the equipment
as he delivered the CO his coffee.
Just some thoughts.
73
Glenn
WB4UIV
At 05:04 PM 09/24/06, Hue Miller wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <jcoward5452 at aol.com>
>The covers were for salt spray and oil ,fuel
>vapor protection.Some say for security but on a carrier at sea the
>environment is especially harsh.
> Jay KE6PPF
>
>I sitll don't understand the covers. I would think that inside the aircraft,
>there's not much else you need to protect it. I can't see fuel vapor being
>that strong- if it was, i'd be real afraid to be in the neighborhood- but
>what do i know. Living here on the coast, i notice a "salt fog" residue
>on the car, that my CB antenna spring has corroded, and that even
>walking on the beach on a windy day, you get salt encrusted. However,
>i'd still think that in an aircraft, this would be screened out.
>That cover i aksed about some months back, it turned out to be for
>a GF transmitter, so i guess now i have to look for the cover also for
>the RU receiver.
>BTW, curious, no cover for the ARB allows for mounting of the ZB/
>ARR-1 on top the ARB. -Hue
>______________________________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list