[Milsurplus] RAL receiver

[D C *Mac* Macdonald]

Different author/evaluator?  Quite likely.

Mac - K2GKK/5


----Original Message Follows----
From: W7QHO at aol.com
To: robandpj at earthlink.net, milsurplus at mailman.qth.net, 
W2ykg at cs.com,w1nzr at amsat.org, curator at battleshipcove.com, 
kn2x at verizon.net,W2rbk at aol.com, holden7471 at msn.com, navrad at ptd.net, 
w2rm at arrl.net,wa6ope at hotmail.com, toober at bestweb.net
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] RAL receiver
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:13:03 EDT


In a message dated 10/18/06 3:24:45 PM, robandpj at earthlink.net writes:


 > I thought you would like this quote from one of the old Surplus 
Conversion
 > Manuals.  I don't know which, I think I got this on BAMA or another
 > schematic download page:
 >
 > "While it is possible to use the RAL for amateur communications, it is an
 > almost hopeless antique and certainly not worthy of any conversion 
efforts."
 >
 > Quite a contrast to the article in September CQ, HI
 >

The quote is from the 1960 "Surplus Schematics Handbook" PUBLISHED BY CQ!
Guess they changed their minds.

Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA
______________________________________________________________
Milsurplus mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net