[Milsurplus] seek info and connectors for "sceaming Mimi"

[William Donzelli]

> 99-44/100% of everyone I've ever heard talk about the Navy's use of MG-sets
> either said they couldn't understand why they did (if the speaker was polite)
> or said the Navy always did things the stupid Navy way (if they were poorly
> educated AH's).

It is also pretty hard to break a Navy MG set. They can take a lot of
abuse and neglect before they head south. Like any high quality motor
of the era, you could ignore the things for months and not notice any
effect on the output. Way more than the tube and CuO rectifiers during
World War 2 - it seems that the Navy would only spec these rectifiers
for shore equipments.

The Signal Corps was never big into MG sets. A few 1930s sets have
them, apparently carrier by six apes. Oddly, one of them (SCR-132, I
think) has a very unique motor - the only single phase, 110 VAC, 5 HP
motor I have ever seen.

--
Will