[Milsurplus] ATD

[William Donzelli]

> I think they would have been better off with BC-348 receivers.  
> Logistically one BC-348 would be easier to support than three
> failure-prone separate receivers, and the installation itself would
> take up less volume and weight.

Failure-prone or redundant? I would go with the latter. The BC-348 has
oodles more single points of failure.

William Donzelli
aw288 at osfn.org