[Milsurplus] Navigation System

[WA5CAB at cs.com]

Unfortunately, I should have pulled out the drawer and looked first.  The two 
cable connectors I have are spoken for.  It was the chassis ones that I have 
a handful of, and most people would probably just grab another receiver rather 
than replacing that.

But no, the twinax used on the R-390 family isn't the same.  The one we're 
talking about is substantially the same as a PL-259 (UHF) but with two pins.  
And is unpolarized.  The one on the 390's is larger (but with smaller solid 
pins), keyed, more complicated, and is the same as later used in Token Ring 
network cabling.

I just went through the Allied catalog and although I found the Token Ring 
style, no one lists the UHF style any more.

In a message dated 3/18/2006 7:21:31 AM Central Standard Time, 
kongomt at yahoo.com writes: 
> Well, Robert has spoken up that he has the connectors
> and ... well, wasn't that the same twinax that went to
> the two-conductor connectors on the R-390 (or some
> receiver of that ilk)?  If I remember right, it was 93
> ohm and I'm sure I've seen that somewhere.  (Where is
> another question! <G>) 
> 

Robert Downs - Houston
<http://www.wa5cab.com> (Web Store)
MVPA 9480
<wa5cab at cs.com> (Primary email)
<wa5cab at houston.rr.com> (Backup email)