RE: [Milsurplus] Wanted R-392 Info R-808?

WF2U wf2u at starband.net
Sat Jul 1 19:05:02 EDT 2006


I don't know but I tried both R-808 receivers I used to have years ago on
both supply options and didn't notice any difference. I also tried the 2
R-808's  I have now on both power options and there is no difference I can
tell in these either...

I'll also try to run the T-631/GRC-14 from 28 VDC and will see.

73, Meir WF2U
Landrum, SC


> -----Original Message-----
> From: milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of W7QHO at aol.com
> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 6:54 PM
> To: kargo_cult at msn.com; milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] Wanted R-392  Info  R-808?
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/1/06 2:22:37 PM, kargo_cult at msn.com writes:
>
>
> > Dennis, why this about the supply??? I don't get it. Lack of
> regulation ??
> >
> >
> Hugh,
>
> Didn't dig into it.   The symptom as I remember was distorted audio and a
> tendency to overload on strong signals.   Anyway, had been using
> a 392 with the
> ATC so had the plug right there ready to go and I used it.   (The
> 808 and 392
> are plug compatible for muting and 28 volts in.)   W6GER who has a GRC-14
> reports the same problems when running off 115vac, BTW.
>

>
> Dennis D. W7QHO
> Glendale, CA
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list