[Milsurplus] Where was RAL & RAK used?

William Donzelli aw288 at osfn.org
Mon Jan 2 17:23:28 EST 2006


> I was told that the main reason the OT ops didn't care for the RBB 
> contraptions was that they tended to overload more easily than the 
> RAK/L, by nearby transmitters which were not on the receive frequency.

Perhaps, but sounds like a handy excuse. At sea, the transmitter just were
not used very much.

William Donzelli
aw288 at osfn.org 



More information about the Milsurplus mailing list