[Milsurplus] 24 Volt BC-312's & KC-97L

[James C Whartenby]

The lower frequency IF of the BC-312 would make it more frequency
selective then the BC-348 for starters.  I was surprised at how well the
BC-342 that I have up and running, performs receiving SSB.  Haven't tried
a BC-348, so no nothing about it's frequency stability compared to the
BC-312/342.  Don't think weight is an issue since the ARC-21/65 was
installed in the aircraft!  I agree it is a strange installation. Other
receivers, like the Navy ARR-41 may have been more appropriate but not
available?
Regards,
Jim

On Mon, 16 May 2005 23:26:15 -0700 "Hue Miller" <kargo_cult at msn.com>
writes:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James C Whartenby" <antqradio at juno.com>
> 
> > If a BC-312 was found properly mounted in an aircraft, why is this 
> bogus?
> >  Could it be the result of a need that was better filled by a 
> BC-312?  
> 
> Please explain how that need might be best filled by a BC-312.
> -Hue Miller
> ______________________________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> 
>