[Milsurplus] LO radiation and the TBX
Bob Wilder
bwils at bellsouth.net
Mon Mar 28 14:47:27 EST 2005
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2005 -0600, Mike Morrow wrote:
>Ray wrote:
>
> > My point in all of this is that when the TBX was redesigned
> > to the eight series their was a number of improvements to
> > the radio, remote capability, improved audio, CW side tone
> > and a separate MO for the transmitter, but they still had no
> > stage of RF amplification for the receiver.
>
>I've heard or read speculation over the years that the TBX-8 never made it
>to service before WWII ended. It's always seemed to me that all the work
>that went into re-making the TBX-8 was pretty pointless in such an
>obsolete sow's ear system.
>
> >Just a mixer coupled to the antenna. If the Navy had any
> >concerns about LO radiation why did they not address it then?
>
>I don't think any convincing evidence exists that there was any concern,
>nor need to be concerned, with LO radiation, especially for sets utilized
>as the TBX was.
>
> >the TBX was eventually replaced by better radios long before the wars
> >end, and by comparison in the Army they had two stages of RF in the
> >BC-342, BC-312 and BC-348 receivers, maybe for twice the isolation?
>
>The USN's MAB/DAV HF portables lacked RF stages, while the Signal Corps'
>BC-611, BC-654, and BC-1306 sets have one RF stage. I believe that the
>USN's other HF "portable," the RBM, has two RF stages, and the RBZ has
>one, as does the TCS, RAX, ARA, and ARB. However, the real point of
>having one or more tuned RF stages in a low IF, single conversion receiver
>covering a large frequency segment (i.e., BC-312, -348) is to improve
>image rejection, not to reduce LO radiation. The TBX frequency range is
>pretty narrow, and image response was likely not a worrisome problem in
>its intended operating environment.
>
>73,
>Mike / KK5F
Think Mike hit the answer. The IF of the TBX is 1515 KC with 2-8 MC RX and
2-5.8 MC TX.
This was the radio of choice of the code talkers with 3W AM and 9W CW.
>______________________________________________________________
>Milsurplus mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 3/27/2005
Bob & Carole Wilder
6032 Idlemoore Court
Theodore, AL 36582-4117
251-653-5274
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-af2hd
Asst USAF State MARS Director- Alabama
AF2HD/AFA2HD
{Ex W2ZRX, K4FEU, KG1BW, F7CP, W1HJL, W4NVH and W4RHW}
All incoming and outgoing messages are
checked for virus using AVG version 7.0.308
and Virus database (475) 266.8.4 updated 03/27/2005
Get your copy of this excellent virus checker at
http://www.grisoft.com/us/us_index.php
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 3/27/2005
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list