[Milsurplus] Re: Milsurplus Digest, Why 60 Hz.

Brooke Clarke brooke at pacific.net
Sun Jun 19 15:56:02 EDT 2005


Hi Ken:

This is a question that I've also wondered about.  The two key figures 
are Tesla and Westinghouse.  I have a number of possible reasons at:
http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/electron.shtml#Nikola

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke, N6GCE
-- 
w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com


Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:16:21 -0700
> From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon at moscow.com>
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] 60 Hz.
> To: Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <42B545F5.32509.E3DB8BF at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Patrick Jankowiak wrote:
> 
> 
>>Can anyone say why 60Hz was chosen?
> 
> 
> My understanding was that "they" turned up the frequency until the 
> lights stopped blinking noticeably. Apparently either the bulbs used 
> here had shorter persistence than those used in Europe, or they had 
> poorer eyes.
> 
> Ken W7EKB


More information about the Milsurplus mailing list