[Milsurplus] WWII-era USN headphone question
Mike Hanz
AAF-Radio-1 at cox.net
Tue Jul 19 15:42:22 EDT 2005
Some things seem to come in spurts. Last week an old B-17 flight
engineer wrote this in another reflector:
My pilots were on UHF/VHF, and I as engineer was on intercom...this
necessitated my leaving my left earphone off, the pilot left his right
earphone off and the copilot left his left earphone off....we three in
the cockpit had to YELL to communicate with each other...and I have a
hearing loss because of this practice.
I realize this is a B-29 Forum, however, if there was a chance of enemy
fighters, the same would apply to a B-29, or the B-24.
I cannot speak for the B-29 crews as I did not fly combat in the B-29.
I merely wanted to point out, that the gunners had priority on the
interphone.
I mentioned in the web page reference on headphones that the Navy had
solved this problem back in 1936 with the H-2 split feed headphones and
dual interphone amps. Today I saw a note that Jacob Beser wrote to Paul
Tibbets in 1989, discussing various equipment he had used (or thought he
had used) in the atomic weapon missions, and his narrative underlines
the sad lack of response by the Signal Corps to USAAF operational
needs. Beser essentially built a pair of Navy H-2 headphones and a
custom junction box to allow switching of the source feeds. Just like
the RL-24 interphone system...duhhhh. See
http://www.childrenofthemanhattanproject.org/collections/mp-pfil/pages/mpp-pfil-072.htm
for the complete text of the letter. Beser got several of the
nomenclatures wrong (I would too after 44 years), and he seems to be
blurring things he and other Raven officers did in training runs versus
the actual weapon delivery missions, but the letter is an interesting
read regardless.
73,
Mike
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list