[Milsurplus] 220 MHz ham band AM usage?

[James M. Walker]

Here in Buffalo, it is 144.40 and who cares about Packet?
Jim
WB2FCN

----- Original Message -----
From: <telegrapher at att.net>
To: <flood at Krohne.com>
Cc: <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>; "David Ross" <ross at hypertools.com>; "James
M. Walker" <chejmw at acsu.buffalo.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] 220 MHz ham band AM usage?


> IF i recall correctly here in the Phoenix area its 144.450.  Seems i saw
that on a piece of scrap paper here on the desk the other day.  Tuesday
nights.  Listen for us!!
>
> Larry
>
>
> >
> >                       flood
> >                                                To:      David Stinson
> > <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>
> >                       05/21/2004 11:25         cc:      "James M.
Walker"
> > <chejmw at acsu.buffalo.edu>, flood at Krohne.com,
> >                       AM
milsurplus at mailman.qth.net,
> > milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net, David Ross
> >                                                <ross at hypertools.com>
> >                                                Subject: Re: [Milsurplus]
220 MHz
> > ham band AM usage?(Document link: flood)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Here near Boston we use 144.425.  However some older, less selective
> > radios, sometimes get bothered by packet data bursts.
> >
> > John Flood
> > TASC Department
> > KROHNE, Inc
> > 7 Dearborn Rd.
> > Peabody, MA   01960
> > Tel.:  978-535-6060 / 800-356-9464
> > Fax:   978-535-8180
> >
> >
> >
> >                       David Stinson
> >                       <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>            To:      "James M.
Walker"
> > <chejmw at acsu.buffalo.edu>
> >                       Sent by:                        cc:
flood at Krohne.com,
> > David Ross <ross at hypertools.com>, milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> >                       milsurplus-bounces at mail         Subject: Re:
[Milsurplus]
> > 220 MHz ham band AM usage?
> >                       man.qth.net
> >
> >
> >                       05/21/2004 11:07 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > James M. Walker wrote:
> >
> > > I am on 6 meter AM, 1 KW input, also 2 meter AM 1 KW input, and more
> > > recently
> > > 220 AM also at, you guessed it 1 KW input.
> >
> > Have you folks settled on a "standard" calling freq for 2-mtr AM?
> > I was thinking 144.250 was a good one.
> > 73 Dave S.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Milsurplus mailing list
> > Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Milsurplus mailing list
> > Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>
>