[Milsurplus] 220 MHz ham band AM usage?
telegrapher at att.net
telegrapher at att.net
Fri May 21 11:46:04 EDT 2004
IF i recall correctly here in the Phoenix area its 144.450. Seems i saw that on a piece of scrap paper here on the desk the other day. Tuesday nights. Listen for us!!
Larry
>
> flood
> To: David Stinson
> <arc5 at ix.netcom.com>
> 05/21/2004 11:25 cc: "James M. Walker"
> <chejmw at acsu.buffalo.edu>, flood at Krohne.com,
> AM milsurplus at mailman.qth.net,
> milsurplus-bounces at mailman.qth.net, David Ross
> <ross at hypertools.com>
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] 220 MHz
> ham band AM usage?(Document link: flood)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Here near Boston we use 144.425. However some older, less selective
> radios, sometimes get bothered by packet data bursts.
>
> John Flood
> TASC Department
> KROHNE, Inc
> 7 Dearborn Rd.
> Peabody, MA 01960
> Tel.: 978-535-6060 / 800-356-9464
> Fax: 978-535-8180
>
>
>
> David Stinson
> <arc5 at ix.netcom.com> To: "James M. Walker"
> <chejmw at acsu.buffalo.edu>
> Sent by: cc: flood at Krohne.com,
> David Ross <ross at hypertools.com>, milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> milsurplus-bounces at mail Subject: Re: [Milsurplus]
> 220 MHz ham band AM usage?
> man.qth.net
>
>
> 05/21/2004 11:07 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> James M. Walker wrote:
>
> > I am on 6 meter AM, 1 KW input, also 2 meter AM 1 KW input, and more
> > recently
> > 220 AM also at, you guessed it 1 KW input.
>
> Have you folks settled on a "standard" calling freq for 2-mtr AM?
> I was thinking 144.250 was a good one.
> 73 Dave S.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
More information about the Milsurplus
mailing list