[Milsurplus] URM-25D vs. URM-25F

[David Edsall]

Mahlon and the group,

Some years ago, as I recall, the received wisdom was that the URM-25D was
the standard by which they were measured, and the F-model was inferior - the
D's were snapped up, while F's sold for less and were the last to go.  There
were some exterior differences, but I don't know if they mirrored any
interior mods.  BTW, mine is the URM-25D.
Is that how others remember it?
David, W1TDD

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mahlon Haunschild" <mahlonhaunschild at cox.net>
To: <milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 8:37 PM
Subject: [Milsurplus] URM-25D vs. URM-25F


> Hello, list.
>
> The other day on this list (I think it was on this list) someone allowed
> as how he thought the URM-25F was better than its older URM-25D sibling.
>   Could you please summarize your thoughts on this for us?  I own a
> URM-25F, but I was unaware that there were any significant functional or
> performance differences between the two.
>
> Any "gotchas" or things to look our for in a URM-25F?  Like replace all
> paper capacitors (I don't think it has any, actually...)?
>
> regards,
>
> Mahlon - K4OQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> Milsurplus mailing list
> Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/milsurplus
>