[Milsurplus] E. H. Scottr RCH or SLR-F?

[Al Parker]

Hi Bob,
    Boy, this subject sure has expanded ;-)    (not meaning your post).
    From what I've learned from starting this (I'm to blame), your rcvr,
with the slide rule type dial, was the morale rcvr, and the "plain" RCH or
SLR-F was a communications rcvr.  I hope to put some sense and arrangement
to what I've learned, and post it to the list.  And thanks to all who have
commented, both publicly & privately.
    There is a website for the EH Scott Historical Society's manuals:
http://www.schroeder-dieball.com/scottradiolabs/schematic_manual_source.htm
    and the addressee there has been of help to me in my quest for info.
I can send you an MS
Word att. showing model names, contract no.s, etc, if you'd like.
    From the pic you sent me, yours sure looks good from the outside, and
from what I can see re: design and construction, they all should be worthy
of restoration, or at least "refurbishment."
73,
Al, W8UT
New Bern, NC
BoatAnchors appreciated here
http://www.thecompendium.net/radio/
http://www.hammarlund.info


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "RJ Mattson" <rjmattson at hvi.net>
To: "Al Klase" <skywaves at webex.net>
Cc: "Al Parker" <anchor at ec.rr.com>; <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] E. H. Scottr RCH or SLR-F?


> Hi All
> How does the SLR-F compare to my SLR-12-B ?
> Picture of my SLR-12-B: http://www.hvinet.com/rjmattson/slr12b
> I have had it staged for years to restore but it never gets to the front
> of the line. It looks intact but is it worth the time to restore? Only
goes
> to 15.6 mcs.
> Regards,
> bob...w2ami
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Al Klase" <skywaves at webex.net>
> To: "Ed Zeranski" <ezeran at concentric.net>
> Cc: "Al Parker" <anchor at ec.rr.com>; "Kenneth G. Gordon"
> <kgordon at moscow.com>; <Milsurplus at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [Milsurplus] E. H. Scottr RCH or SLR-F?
>
>
>
>