[Milsurplus] Re: RS-6
Hue Miller
[email protected]
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:54:52 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "Smith" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 6:38 AM
> Reference: RS-6
> Having been an aircrew member for many years while I
> was in the U.S. Air Force, I seriously doubt that the RS-6 was designed and
> issued for aircrew use. The main reason is that the radio is cumbersome and hard
> to operate and is a CW only device. It would take a very experienced and highly
> trained radio operator to use this equipment and to make a two way contact.
However, "experienced and highly trained radio operators" were
available, weren't there? Particularly after they specifically trained
on this equipment?
> One of the biggest problems that I have found with the RS-6 is that it has no
> crystal or transmit spotting capability so that you could find your signal on
> the receiver . . .
How many of the clandestine equipments can you think of, that did
have net facility?
Hue Miller