[Milsurplus] Re: British Army Radio During WWII

[Hue Miller]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WF2U" <wf2u@starband.net>

> Then, for example take the British R107 receiver - it's far better and more
> serviceably built than the mission-equivalent BC-312/342.

The R-107 was in small vehicles? As well as frontline 
emplacements? I mean regarding " mission-equivalent".

> Its bigger an
> heavier but in side-by-side operation,  they're equivalent, the R107 drifts
> less, probably due to the larger and sturdier chassis.
> 
> The R1155 receiver which is the functional equivalent of the BC-348 is also
> just as good a performer as it's US counterpart, and it's a little smaller
> due to its external dynamotor supply, and the receiver includes a D/F unit.

-How about the dial resolution and tuning rate, kc/s per
revolution, on both the R-107 and R-1155 ?
Hue